This post has been moved. It can be found here.
Thursday, December 12, 2013
Wednesday, September 4, 2013
Kevin Rudd on Slavery, Same-Sex Marriage and Biblical Literacy
This week Prime Minister Kevin Rudd used a confused argument about the Bible to defend his position on same-sex marriage.
Tuesday, June 11, 2013
Four Research Issues Relating to Same-Sex Marriage
This post gives an overview of
what I have been able to learn about research studies about issues which affect the
same-sex marriage debate. I have a table below which summarizes claims and findings about four key empirical questions relevant to the same-sex marriage debate.
Friday, June 7, 2013
Queering Marriage
The current push for same-sex marriage is but a staging post in a deeper and longer-term campaign being waged against heteronormativity and heterosexism. Heteronormativity is the assumption that heterosexuality is the norm and heterosexism is the resulting bias in favour of opposite sex relationships.
Wednesday, May 29, 2013
In Defense of Marriage: a response to Kevin Rudd
I was intrigued to read of Kevin Rudd's change of heart on gay marriage last week. He now supports changing the legal definition of marriage to encompass same-sex relationships. Whereas in 2008 Rudd championed the removal of all other forms of discrimination against same-sex couples, he now believes Australia should go all the way to equalize same-sex relations, right down to and including the fundamental building block of the family, marriage itself.
Saturday, April 27, 2013
Dr Kermit Gosnell's Chamber of Horrors
Dr Kermit Gosnell was until recently an abortion provider in
Philadelphia. When a raid was conducted against his facility, euphemistically referred to as the Family and Women's Medical Society, what FBI agents and state police discovered horrified them.
Tuesday, March 5, 2013
Looking for marriage in all the wrong places -- By Spengler
This article was originally published here with the Asia Times.
Two mutually incompatible arguments are advanced to defend gay marriage. The first states that marriage is a good thing provided by the state, such that gay people have the same right to it as anyone else. The second states that marriage is a bad thing, and that bringing gay people into the institution of marriage will destroy it from the inside.
Two mutually incompatible arguments are advanced to defend gay marriage. The first states that marriage is a good thing provided by the state, such that gay people have the same right to it as anyone else. The second states that marriage is a bad thing, and that bringing gay people into the institution of marriage will destroy it from the inside.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)